II—Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution
Identifieur interne : 000D01 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D00; suivant : 000D02II—Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution
Auteurs : Ruth Chang [États-Unis]Source :
- Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume [ 0309-7013 ] ; 2009-06.
Abstract
Most familiar approaches to social conflict moot reasonable ways of dealing with conflict, ways that aim to serve values such as legitimacy, justice, morality, fairness, fidelity to individual preferences, and so on. In this paper, I explore an alternative approach to social conflict that contrasts with the leading approaches of Rawlsians, perfectionists, and social choice theorists. The proposed approach takes intrinsic features of the conflict—what I call a conflict's evaluative ‘structure’—as grounds for a rational way of responding to that conflict. Like conflict within a single person, social conflict can have a distinctive evaluative structure that supports certain rational responses over others. I suggest that one common structure in both intra‐ and interpersonal cases of conflict supports the rational response of ‘self‐governance’. Self‐governance in the case of social conflict involves a society's deliberating over the question, ‘What kind of society should we be?’ In liberal democracies, this rational response is also a reasonable one.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00176.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002E54
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002993
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000772
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000D11
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000D01
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">II—Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution</title><author><name sortKey="Chang, Ruth" sort="Chang, Ruth" uniqKey="Chang R" first="Ruth" last="Chang">Ruth Chang</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2EF17C67BE614EF56D3F5D04D9AD91CD820C8180</idno><date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00176.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2EF17C67BE614EF56D3F5D04D9AD91CD820C8180/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E54</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002993</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000772</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0309-7013:2009:Chang R:ii:reflections:on</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000D11</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000D01</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000D01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">II—Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution</title><author><name sortKey="Chang, Ruth" sort="Chang, Ruth" uniqKey="Chang R" first="Ruth" last="Chang">Ruth Chang</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, 26 Nichol Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">New Jersey</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université Rutgers</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume</title><idno type="ISSN">0309-7013</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8349</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2009-06">2009-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="133">133</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="160">160</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0309-7013</idno></series><idno type="istex">2EF17C67BE614EF56D3F5D04D9AD91CD820C8180</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00176.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SUPA176</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0309-7013</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most familiar approaches to social conflict moot reasonable ways of dealing with conflict, ways that aim to serve values such as legitimacy, justice, morality, fairness, fidelity to individual preferences, and so on. In this paper, I explore an alternative approach to social conflict that contrasts with the leading approaches of Rawlsians, perfectionists, and social choice theorists. The proposed approach takes intrinsic features of the conflict—what I call a conflict's evaluative ‘structure’—as grounds for a rational way of responding to that conflict. Like conflict within a single person, social conflict can have a distinctive evaluative structure that supports certain rational responses over others. I suggest that one common structure in both intra‐ and interpersonal cases of conflict supports the rational response of ‘self‐governance’. Self‐governance in the case of social conflict involves a society's deliberating over the question, ‘What kind of society should we be?’ In liberal democracies, this rational response is also a reasonable one.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>New Jersey</li></region><orgName><li>Université Rutgers</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="New Jersey"><name sortKey="Chang, Ruth" sort="Chang, Ruth" uniqKey="Chang R" first="Ruth" last="Chang">Ruth Chang</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= MozartV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:2EF17C67BE614EF56D3F5D04D9AD91CD820C8180
|texte= II—Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20. |  |